Comparação entre técnicas cirurgicas no tratamento da recessão gengival

Abstract

Objectives: To compare different surgical techniques used in the treatment of gingival recession, evaluating their predictability, effectiveness, and aesthetic outcomes. Methodology: This study is a literature review based on the analysis of scientific articles published in PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar databases. Studies addressing tunneling technique and coronally advanced flap were selected, considering criteria such as clinical attachment gain, recession depth, and root coverage. Results: The analyzed techniques showed high success rates in root coverage, especially when associated with subepithelial connective tissue graft. The use of biomaterials also demonstrated promising results, with improved aesthetics and reduced postoperative morbidity. Conclusion: Both techniques are effective in the treatment of gingival recession; however, the choice of approach should be based on the patient’s clinical characteristics, type of recession, and professional experience, aiming for predictable, stable, and aesthetically satisfactory long-term outcomes.